ArticleScientific reports2025
Lightweight self supervised learning framework for domain generalization in histopathology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliability of foundation models for image retrieval in histopathology.Npj imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of large foundation models (FMs) in histopathology, trained on extensive image datasets using high-performance graphics processing unit (GPU) clusters, has demonstrated significant potential in advancing computational pathology. FMs have potential to overcome the domain gap between training and testing datasets, which creates more translation opportunities. However, the reliance on vast computational resources and large-scale data often limits accessibility and widespread adoption of FMs. To address this limitation, we present HistoLite, a lightweight self-supervised learning framework designed to enable domain-invariant representation learning in histopathology. HistoLite utilizes customizable auto-encoders within a self-supervised learning paradigm that learns generalized and transferable features in an efficient manner. We evaluated the proposed framework using breast Whole Slide Images (WSIs) and benchmarked performance with state-of-the-art FMs for domain generalization. A novel dataset was curated that is of the same tissue slides, scanned by two different scanning platforms, which allows for specific analysis of covariate shifts due to scanner bias. Aspects evaluated include the difference in embeddings across scanners using novel representation shift metrics, including a robustness index, and accuracy, which looks at performance on downstream tasks. The top performing models were UNI, Virchow2 and Prov-GigaPath, likely due to large model sizes and training datasets. In general, most FMs were found to be susceptible to scanner-bias, as shown by differences in embeddings and drop in performance on the held-out scanner. This has significant implications for real-world deployment of FMs in histopathology. HistoLite offered low representation shift in embeddings, the lowest performance drop on out-of-domain data with modest classification accuracy, indicating the smaller model may exhibit a tradeoff between accuracy and generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.