ArticleScientific reports2025
Visual outcomes and anatomical biomarkers of Faricimab for diabetic macular edema in the J-CREST real-world comparison of naïve and treated eyes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Anti-VEGF: Toward Integrated Precision Care in Diabetic Retinal Disease.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Faricimab for Diabetic Macular Edema in Eyes Vitrectomized for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A 12-Month Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Real-World Faricimab for Treatment-Naïve Neovascular AMD and Diabetic Macular Edema: 24-Month Outcomes from a Single-Center Pilot Cohort in South-Eastern Europe.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- First-Line Faricimab in Diabetic Macular Edema: Insights from a Real-World Treatment-Naïve Population in Austria.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the real-world efficacy of intravitreal faricimab for diabetic macular edema (DME) and its relationship with visual and retinal anatomical changes using optical coherence tomography. We retrospectively assessed 174 patients (214 eyes) with DME from 13 Japan Clinical REtina Study Group (J-CREST) sites who received ≥ 1 faricimab injection and were followed ≥ 6 months, and compared treatment-naïve (with no prior anti-VEGF treatment) and previously treated groups. Both groups showed significant improvements in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST BCVA gain was greater in the treatment-naïve group (p = 0.0109), whereas CST reduction showed little difference (p = 0.31). Resolution of cystoid macular oedema, diffuse retinal thickening, and subretinal fluid (SRF) was observed in both groups. Resolution of inner nuclear layer (INL) oedema and SRF significantly correlated with ≥ 0.2 log MAR BCVA improvement in the treatment-naïve group (p = 0.043 and p = 0.022, respectively). Mean number of injections was comparable between groups. One case of anterior chamber inflammation occurred; however, no serious systemic events were observed. In conclusion, faricimab significantly improved visual and anatomical outcomes in DME, especially in treatment-naïve eyes. Early resolution of INL oedema and SRF may serve as a potential biomarker for visual prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.