ArticleScientific data2025
CIRE: A Chinese EEG Dataset for decoding speech intention modulated by prosodic emotion.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CIRE: A Chinese EEG Dataset for decoding speech intention modulated by prosodic emotion.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural decoding of speech intention could advance the development and application of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology. Currently, lack of dataset limited the research on decoding the true speech intention, especially the diverse intentions expressed by the same text when no context is given. This study provides an EEG dataset, CIRE, on spoken language interaction intention featuring aligned textual expressions with divergent intentional meanings due to the differences in prosodic emotion. The dataset comprises preprocessed high-density (128-channel) EEG recordings from 38 participants engaged in comprehension of attitude-conveying speech stimuli, accompanied by Wav2vec2-derived acoustic embeddings of the listening materials. To validate our dataset through cognitive neuroscience studies and binary intent classification, we applied signal processing pipelines, cognitive analysis frameworks, and machine learning (ML) approaches. Our baseline model achieved a cross-subject classification accuracy of 68.2%, with differences exhibiting interpretable neurophysiological correlates. The high-density and high temporal resolution EEG data offer broader application areas, both in cognitive neuroscience and speech BCI, and can also contribute to the brain-inspired algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.