ArticleScientific reports2025
Robust IoT security using isolation forest and one class SVM algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anomaly-resilient geofencing and predictive navigation in IoT environments using machine learning and federated learning for metaverse workplaces and smart shopping malls.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Designing a neuro-symbolic dual-model architecture for explainable and resilient intrusion detection in IoT networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid growth of cloud computing and the Internet of Things (IoT) has increased the exposure of IoT devices to cyber-attacks due to their resource limitations and lack of standardized security protocols. This paper presents a robust anomaly detection framework for IoT networks using two unsupervised machine learning models: Isolation Forest (IF) and One-Class Support Vector Machine (OCSVM). Leveraging the TON_IoT dataset, we conduct a comparative evaluation of IF, OCSVM, and a lightweight fusion approach called Combined Scoring Anomaly Detection (CSAD). Results show that OCSVM achieves superior precision, recall, and accuracy compared to both IF and CSAD. To ensure reliability, we apply Random Forest-based feature importance analysis, fivefold cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning. Model resilience is further examined under adversarial label-flip poisoning attacks and interpretability is enhanced through Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME). The findings demonstrate that lightweight unsupervised algorithms can provide effective, low-resource anomaly detection for modern IoT environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.