ArticleScientific reports2025
Proximity to water shapes the distribution of natural elephant mortality in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modelling the spatial and temporal dynamics in the distribution patterns of African White backed vultures Gyps africanus in the Hwange National Park.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While elephant poaching has received considerable attention, natural mortality can at times surpass human-induced deaths, especially under environmental stress. Understanding the ecological drivers of natural elephant mortality is therefore crucial for informing reintroduction efforts and preventing mass die-offs. In this study, we investigated environmental predictors of natural elephant mortality in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, using mortality records from 2020 to 2022. We applied four machine learning species distribution models, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Maximum Entropy, and Extreme Gradient Boosting, along with their ensemble to model mortality hotspots. The ensemble model outperformed individual models, achieving a True Skill Statistic of 0.54 and a Receiver Operating Characteristic of 0.83. Among all predictors, distance to water sources was the most influential variable (accounting for > 55% of model importance), with most mortalities occurring within 6 km of water points. Other key predictors included climate water deficit, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), tree cover percentage, and elephant density (each contributing > 5%). In contrast, maximum temperature of the warmest month and elevation had minimal predictive power (< 4%). Our results provide actionable insights for conservation planning. Areas close to water sources, particularly during dry periods, should be prioritized for monitoring and veterinary intervention. Meanwhile, regions with historically low mortality prevalences may serve as safer sites for reintroduction. This spatially explicit framework can help reduce post-release losses and enhance the long-term success of elephant conservation initiatives, especially in the face of ongoing environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.