ArticleScientific reports2025
Vulnerability assessment model integrating outcome and characteristic-based metrics for electric motorcycle battery swapping and charging stations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Battery swapping and charging stations are essential for increasing the adoption of electric motorcycles. The stations address the range anxiety issue and quickly obtain a fully recharged battery. However, operational issues with swapping and charging activities drive operational vulnerability. Therefore, this study proposes a vulnerability assessment model utilizing the IoT Platform data of electric motorcycle battery swapping and charging stations. The model computes a vulnerability score by integrating vulnerability indicator metrics of the system outcome and characteristic. The system outcome uses performance data representing vulnerability impact. The system characteristic uses data from the vulnerability driver and exposure factors. The driver factor represents mitigation ability, and the exposure factor represents conditions that may affect both the mitigation ability and performance. The model also classifies the vulnerability of stations in four categories: not vulnerable, potentially vulnerable, moderately vulnerable, and vulnerable. The model was implemented in a case in Jakarta. The result reveals significant differences in vulnerability among stations, although most stations fall into the not vulnerable to moderately vulnerable categories. The findings facilitate identifying station characteristics that potentially affect performance quantitatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.