ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of seven fermentation methods for enhancing the fertilizer potential of the liquid fraction of cow manure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the use of cow manure as a crop fertilizer has received widespread attention, the impact of different fermentation methods (FMs) on the potential of liquid fraction of cow manure as a crop fertilizer has not been thoroughly assessed. To address this gap, we investigated the effects of seven FMs over a 13-week period on the physicochemical characteristics of cow wastewater and evaluated its potential for reuse as a soil fertilizer. Our findings demonstrated that diverse FMs resulted in variations in average root length (ARL) and germination index (GI), whereas all FMs increased the germination percentage to over 80% after five weeks of fermentation. All FMs steadily reduced the levels of NO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.