ArticleNature communications2025
Structural basis for 3C and 3CD recruitment by enteroviral genomes during negative-strand RNA synthesis.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Poliovirus 3Dpol polymerase region is essential for cleavage of poliovirus 3AB in vivo.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Structures of the eIF4G-binding RNA domains among picornaviral IRES types are topologically conserved.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enteroviral replication-linked cloverleaf RNAs recruit the viral 3CD protein, a fusion of 3C protease and 3D RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase, for negative-strand synthesis during genome replication. However, the structures and mechanisms of this virological process remain unclear. Using the coxsackievirus B3 model, we determine the crystal structures of both intact cloverleaf-3C and isolated sD-3C complexes at 2.69 Å and 2.41 Å resolutions, respectively. Our structures reveal that the sD stem-loop is the sole determinant for binding two 3C monomers, with each monomer recognizing the lateral surface of the sD stem either upstream (toward the apical tetraloop) or downstream (near the dinucleotide bulge) of the Py•Py helix. Binding studies with structure-guided cloverleaf and 3C mutants further clarify the roles of specific nucleotides and residues involved in the interactions between cloverleaf and 3C, explaining earlier virological observations. Through comparative structural and binding studies of 3C, 3D, and 3CD with cloverleafs from seven different enteroviral species, we demonstrate that while the 3D domain does not contribute to cloverleaf binding, the sD sequence and its structural pattern govern 3CD-cloverleaf interactions through the 3C domain. Our work establishes a high-resolution structural framework for understanding enteroviral replication mechanisms, which will aid in developing antivirals targeting this platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.