ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025
Bronchial hyper-reactivity in young adults after hospitalisation for bronchiolitis in infancy.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBronchiolitis is associated with asthma persisting until adulthood. While bronchial hyper-reactivity (BHR) is a hallmark of asthma, its occurrence and characteristics after bronchiolitis have been less studied. We aimed to study if BHR differed between young adults hospitalised for bronchiolitis in infancy and control subjects with no such history. Further, we sought to study whether any association between asthma and BHR differed between these two groups.
methodsThis Norwegian historical cohort study included 186 young adults hospitalised for respiratory syncytial virus positive or negative bronchiolitis in infancy during 1996-2001 and 139 matched control subjects. BHR was assessed at 17-20 years by methacholine provocation tests and recorded as dose-response slopes (DRS). Outcomes were analysed by mixed effects regression models.
resultsDRS was higher in the post-bronchiolitis group than in the control group (regression coefficient (β) 0.37; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.73; p=0.045). In both groups combined, current asthma was positively associated with DRS (β 0.98; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.45; p<0.001). Stratified analyses showed that the effect (β) of asthma on BHR was 0.80 (95% CI 0.21 to 1.38; p=0.008) in the post-bronchiolitis group and 1.40 (95% CI 0.58 to 2.23; p=0.001) in the control group. The difference in the association between asthma and BHR across the two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.191 for interaction).
conclusionsBHR at age 17-20 years was higher in subjects hospitalised for bronchiolitis in infancy than in control subjects. The association between asthma and BHR was not found to differ between the post-bronchiolitis group and the control group, although a possible stronger association in the control group may warrant further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.