Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120174›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Comparing high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and non-invasive ventilation to standard oxygenation in non-selected intensive care unit patients admitted for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: protocol for the KISS (Key oxygenation Interventions in Surgical and non-Surgical patients) adaptive randomised controlled trial.

Samir Jaber, Helena Huguet, Nicolas Molinari, Audrey De Jong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05812911 (An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05812911 naterminatednot on this map

An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Comparing High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen and Noninvasive Ventilation to Standard Oxygenation in Non-selected Intensive Care Unit Patients Admitted for Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure: The KISS Trial (Key Oxygenation Interventions in Surgical and Non-Surgical Patients)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2023 to 2026Enrolled1,470ConditionsAcute Respiratory FailureArmsStandard oxygen, HFNO, NIV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samir JaberDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Montpellier University Hospital, PhymedExp, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France s-jaber@chu-montpellier.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-8069
Helena HuguetEpidemiology and Clinical Research Department, University of Montpellier, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Nicolas MolinariIMAG Laboratory, CNRS, University of Montpellier, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Audrey De JongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Montpellier University Hospital, PhymedExp, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHypoxaemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is associated with high mortality. Three main devices are used to provide oxygen to hypoxaemic ARF patients: non-invasive ventilation (NIV), high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNO) and standard oxygen (first-attempt device in usual care). To date, no multicentre randomised controlled study has compared NIV and HFNO to standard oxygen with day 28 mortality rate as primary outcome in hypoxaemic ARF in non-selected patients. Our hypothesis is that NIV and/or HFNO is superior to standard oxygen to reduce day 28 mortality rate in hypoxaemic ARF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Key oxygenation Interventions in Surgical and non-Surgical patients (KISS) trial is an adaptive investigator-initiated, multicentre, stratified, parallel-group unblinded trial with an electronic system-based randomisation. Patients with hypoxaemic ARF were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the 'NIV-group' to receive curative NIV combined with HFNO delivered between NIV trials, or the 'HFNO' group to receive HFNO alone, or the 'standard oxygen-group' to receive oxygen therapy alone.The primary endpoint is day 28 all-cause mortality. The main secondary endpoint is intubation rate at day 28. The exploratory endpoints are intubation rates at day 3 and day 7; oxygenation up to day 7; need for other rescue oxygen therapy up to day 7; ICU and hospital length of stay; and mortality rates in ICU, hospital and at day 90.The main objective is to assess if NIV and/or HFNO is superior to standard oxygen to reduce day 28 mortality rate in hypoxaemic ARF. Additional comparisons between predefined stratum following randomisation will be performed: (1) medical versus postoperative admissions, (2) among medical (immunocompromised vs non-immunocompromised) and (3) among postoperative (abdominal vs cardio-thoracic).An adaptive design will be used. Two interim analyses will be performed after 700 and 1400 included patients among the 2100 planned. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study project has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee 'Comité-de-Protection-des-Personnes Sud-Est V-23-CHUM-01 Cat2 2022-A02761-42/1'. Informed consent is required. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences. If NIV and/or HFNO reduce the mortality at day 28, NIV and/or HFNO could be proposed to become one of the first-line therapies in hypoxaemic ARF patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05812911.

Indexed as

HypoxiaNoninvasive VentilationOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyRespiratory InsufficiencyCannulaFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicOxygenacute respiratory failurecurativeHFNOhigh-flow nasal oxygenICUintensive care unitNIVnoninvasive ventilation

Identifiers

PMID41120174
PMCPMC12542569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.