ArticleBMJ open2025
Efficacy of Adaptive Blood Purification for Septic Shock (EABPSS): protocol for a randomised, multicentre, parallel controlled study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06692036 (Adaptive Blood Purification for the Treatment of Patients With Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Adaptive Blood Purification for the Treatment of Patients With Septic Shock: a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Parallel Controlled Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is a lack of evidence on the efficacy of extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) to reduce the mortality rate in septic shock. We have designed the EABPSS (Efficacy of Adaptive Blood Purification for Septic Shock) study to confirm whether adaptive blood purification (ABP) intervention could confer a clinical benefit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, we are recruiting a total of 276 patients with septic shock. Eligible patients who provide informed consent will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the control group or the intervention group. Patients in the control group will receive standard care according to the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines. Patients in the intervention group will receive two 6-hour sessions of ABP treatment within 24 hours of enrolment, based on standard care. ABP is a novel, adaptive EBP strategy proposed by our research team. Specifically, for patients with septic shock who do not require renal replacement therapy (RRT), plasmafiltration-adsorption (PFAD) will be used alone, and for patients with septic shock and acute kidney injury meeting RRT indications, a combination of PFAD-RRT will be employed. The primary endpoint of this study is all-cause mortality at 90 days after enrolment. Secondary endpoints of the study include the declining proportion of serum cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and high-mobility group box 1 within 24 hours after enrolment. Additionally, the study will evaluate the improvement of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score on day 7 postenrolment, as well as the 30-day mortality rate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the respective ethical committees of the participant centres, including: Ethics Committee of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University (2024-KE-348); Ethics Committee of PLA General Hospital (S2024-716-01); Ethics Committee of China-Japan Friendship Hospital (2024-KY181); Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital (2024YAN258-001); Ethics Committee of Beijing Hospital (2024BJYYEC-KY106-02); Ethics Committee of Air Force Medical Center, PLA (KONGTE2024-29-PJ01); Ethics Committee of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University (JILUN(K2023)(370)-00). The findings of the study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06692036.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.