Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120152›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Randomised controlled trial to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of remote care compared with in-clinic care for adult cochlear implant recipients in the first 12 months after activation: a protocol of the INSPIRE study.

Nicola Quaranta, Alessandra Murri, Sam Denys, Nicolas Verhaert, Wendy Huinck, Jennifer Townsend, Freya Swinnen, Ingeborg Dhooge, Anel de Klerk, Dhaval Mehta and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05552118 (A Post-Market, Prospective, Multi-Centre, Open-Label, Comparative, Interventional Study of Adult Cochlear Implant Speech Performance and Clinic Efficiency With Remote Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05552118 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Post-Market, Prospective, Multi-Centre, Open-Label, Comparative, Interventional Study of Adult Cochlear Implant Speech Performance and Clinic Efficiency With Remote Care (Remote Check & Remote Assist) Compared With Standard of Care in the First 12 Months Post-initial Activation

TypeinterventionalSponsorCochlearRan2024 to 2026Enrolled148ConditionsHearing LossArmsCochlear™ Remote care, Standard of care, Compatible Implant Series and Compatible Sound Processors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nicola QuarantaOtolaryngology Unit, Department of BMS, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Apulia, Italy nicolaantonioadolfo.quaranta@uniba.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6214-2336
Alessandra MurriOtolaryngology Unit, Department of BMS, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Apulia, Italy.
Sam DenysDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, UZ, Leuven, Belgium.
Nicolas VerhaertDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, UZ, Leuven, Belgium.
Wendy HuinckRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jennifer TownsendNorth Wales Auditory Implant Service, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wales, UK.
Freya SwinnenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, Belgium.
Ingeborg DhoogeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, Belgium.
Anel de KlerkHearing Implant Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Dhaval MehtaSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Davide BrottoSection of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Louise CraddockMidlands Hearing Implant Programme (Adult Service), Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Gijs HoskamMaastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
I Manjula SchouCochlear Limited, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Margaret E McBrideCochlear Limited, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Cherith Campbell-BellCochlear Limited, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPost-surgical care following cochlear implantation is a pivotal part of the rehabilitation journey for cochlear implant (CI) recipients. However, frequent in-clinic visits, particularly in the first year following CI activation, can place a significant burden on CI recipients. Moreover, the growing number of CI recipients may pose a challenge for CI clinics to provide consistent and lifelong care. Cochlear Remote Care is a platform that enables the delivery of post-surgical care through remote hearing assessments and remote video appointments, offering an opportunity to enhance clinic efficiency, eliminate geographical barriers, reduce financial burdens and provide flexible post-surgical options. The primary objective of this study is to compare self-reported hearing ability in daily life among CI recipients who receive post-surgical care through Remote Care with those receiving routine in-clinic care during the first year following CI activation. Additionally, the study will assess the time and costs associated with these care models for both the clinic and patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multi-centre randomised controlled trial is set to be conducted across 11 clinics in the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and Australia, with an anticipated sample size of 148 participants. All participants will be adults with post-lingual deafness and unilateral CIs. Following baseline measurements at 3 months post-activation, participants will be randomly assigned to either in-clinic visits or Remote Care appointments. At six and 12 months after activation, participants will complete a comprehensive battery of audiometric tests and questionnaires on patient-reported outcomes, usability and resource utilisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained for each clinical site. Study findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications, lay language summaries and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05552118.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessAdultAustraliaHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTelemedicineUnited KingdomAudiologyHearingPatient Care ManagementRandomized Controlled TrialTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41120152
PMCPMC12542563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.