Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120143›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Understanding safety threats and resilience supports in the operating room: a mixed-methods protocol study using surgical video analysis and clinician interviews.

Cecil Chikezie, Sonia Pinkney, Mark Fan, Joseph A Cafazzo, Teodor Grantcharov, Patricia Trbovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cecil ChikezieUniversity of Toronto Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, Ontario, Canada cecil.chikezie@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7642-8708
Sonia PinkneyInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark FanCentre for Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joseph A CafazzoUniversity of Toronto Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Teodor GrantcharovDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford, California, USA.
Patricia TrbovichUniversity of Toronto Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8120-5926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreventable intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) are common despite widespread implementation of surgical quality improvement initiatives. These events often result from the interaction of multiple system-based factors (safety threats, STs) that coalesce to compromise safety. Existing research does not fully capture how STs vary across institutions, and how surgical teams either recover from or anticipate challenges (resilience supports, RSs). Consequently, efforts to design and align interventions are hindered by an incomplete understanding of the system-level contributors to patient safety risks. This study uses a human factors approach to gain a comprehensive understanding of STs and RSs across four hospitals by analysing operating room (OR) video recordings and conducting interviews with clinical teams to contextualise STs and RSs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-method study will analyse 120 surgical video recordings from four hospitals, using a comprehensive multimodal data capture platform, called OR Black Box (ORBB, Surgical Safety Technologies New York City, USA). All ORBB videos will be coded for case information, surgical phase, iAE type and severity. Human factor researchers will then retrospectively identify and code STs and RSs, applying a combined deductive (Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety components: person, tasks, tools/technology, environment, organisation) and inductive approach. Detailed qualitative observations of STs and RSs will be transcribed, with the roles of the involved individuals noted. Quantitative and qualitative cross-institutional comparisons will highlight potential effective interventions (eg, radiofrequency sponge detection wands used during surgical counts) at specific sites, offering insights that could inform potential improvements at other institutions. Additionally, interviews with clinicians at each site will provide contextual insights into the prevalent STs and RSs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the research ethics boards of: North York General Hospital (REB #2024-0174-993), a large Canadian community academic hospital; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (REB #5779; REB #6688) and Unity Health Toronto (REB #16243), large Canadian academic hospitals and the Panel on Human Subjects Medical Research of Stanford University (IRB #6208), for its large American academic hospital. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and to stakeholders.

Indexed as

Intraoperative ComplicationsOperating RoomsPatient SafetyHumansInterviews as TopicQuality ImprovementResearch DesignVideo Recordinghealthhospitalsquality improvementrisk factorssafetysurgery

Identifiers

PMID41120143
PMCPMC12542548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.