Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120135›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Mechanisms of change in naturalistic mental health care settings: study protocol for a longitudinal multimethod study.

Phileas Heim, Annette Brose, Maria Böttche, Eva M J Peters, Johannes C Ehrenthal, Christine Knaevelsrud, André Kerber

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Phileas HeimDivision of Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany phileas.heim@fu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1830-7682
Annette BroseDivision of Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Maria BöttcheDivision of Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Eva M J PetersDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Psychoneuroimmunology Laboratory, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Giessen, Germany.
Johannes C EhrenthalDepartment of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christine KnaevelsrudDivision of Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
André KerberDivision of Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-7784

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMental disorders are among the leading causes of the global burden of disease and are often associated with severe functional impairment and high societal costs. Psychotherapeutic, psychopharmacological and internet-based mental health interventions have proven to be helpful, but challenges remain, including only moderate response rates, high relapse rates and barriers to accessing mental healthcare. Much of the existing evidence stems from studies conducted in controlled, often standardised settings that only partially reflect real-world conditions, contributing to a 'scientist-practitioner gap'. Moreover, the mechanisms of change, such as the interaction between treatment intensity, common factors (eg, the therapeutic relationship) and specific intervention techniques, have not been sufficiently investigated. In particular, the relationship of changes in personality functioning (PF) with mental and physical health has not yet been extensively researched. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PSYMPACT (Psychological Impact Factors of Mental Health Treatments) study will use a longitudinal study design with a naturalistic sample (N ≈ 3000) to examine changes in psychopathology, PF and allostatic load in psychotherapeutic, psychopharmacological and internet-based treatments. The aim is to identify factors contributing to improvements and deteriorations in mental and physical health across different settings, including common and specific factors. Additionally, to provide patient perspectives, qualitative interviews will be conducted with individuals with varying levels of severity of mental health problems. Allostatic load will be assessed using repeated hair cortisol measurements. Furthermore, ecological momentary assessment will be used to examine the diurnal variability of PF as well as its more momentary correlates and longer-term outcomes. The central research questions and aims include (1) the assessment of common factors across different treatment settings, (2) associations of specific and common factors with improvements in mental health, including PF, (3 and 4) the importance of treatment intensity and interaction effects with common and specific factors, (5) the association of changes in psychopathology with changes in allostatic load, (6) the trait and state variability of PF, (7) the identification of patients who deteriorate under specific treatments and (8) patients' perspectives on the effectiveness of different treatment modalities. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Department of Education and Psychology at the Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. Results will be submitted to peer-reviewed specialised journals and presented at national and international conferences. REGISTRATION DETAILS: Before data collection started in November 2024, the study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00035560).

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesPsychotherapyAllostasisHumansLongitudinal StudiesPersonalityResearch DesignAnxiety disordersDepression & mood disordersPersonality disordersPSYCHIATRYPsychometricsPsychosocial Intervention

Identifiers

PMID41120135
PMCPMC12542555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.