Trial reportEuropean heart journal2025
Efficacy of aficamten in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and mild symptoms: results from the SEQUOIA-HCM trial.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05186818 (A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CK-3773274 in Adults With Symptomatic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CK-3773274 in Adults With Symptomatic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exercise Training in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.Sports medicine - open · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Course and Predictors of Heart Failure in Asymptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Evolution and Transformation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy From a High Risk to a Treatable Low Mortality Disease With Contemporary Clinical Research Strategies.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- A year in pharmacology: new drugs approved by the US food and drug administration in 2025.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPatients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) treated with aficamten in SEQUOIA-HCM (NCT05186818) demonstrated marked improvement in symptoms and functional capacity. This analysis explores whether oHCM and mild symptoms patients experience similar clinical benefits with aficamten as patients with more advanced limitations.
methodsPatients in SEQUOIA-HCM (N = 282) were grouped at baseline according to symptom severity. Mild symptoms (n = 118) were defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) ≥ 80, and moderate to severe symptoms (n = 150) as NYHA class II/III/IV and KCCQ-CSS <80. Primary endpoint was change in peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) from baseline to Week 24; secondary endpoints included change in NYHA class, KCCQ-CSS, outflow tract gradients, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).
resultsIn aficamten-treated patients, change at Week 24 was not different between moderate to severe (1.8 mL/kg/min; n = 71) and mild (1.6 mL/kg/min; n = 62) symptom groups (P = .8). Likewise, the change in secondary endpoints (NYHA class, resting or Valsalva gradients, and NT-proBNP) did not differ significantly between the two symptom groups. Both groups experienced statistically significant improvements in KCCQ-CSS, but the extent of improvement was greater in the advanced symptom group (P = .02 for interaction). Treatment-emergent serious adverse events were infrequent in both groups.
conclusionsPatients with oHCM and mild symptoms treated with aficamten achieved significant improvement across a range of clinically relevant outcomes and generally similar to patients with more advanced symptoms. Less severely symptomatic patients could be considered for aficamten treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.