Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120002›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Uncovering the role of chemical pollutants in shaping biological invasions.

Isaac Y Ligocki, Jack A Brand, Eli S J Thoré, Upama Aich, Tomas Brodin, Morelia Camacho-Cervantes, Jake M Martin, Amelia Munson, Giovanni Polverino, Bob B M Wong and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Isaac Y LigockiDepartment of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2014-0479
Jack A BrandDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3312-941X
Eli S J ThoréDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0029-8404
Upama AichSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2576-0922
Tomas BrodinDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1086-7567
Morelia Camacho-CervantesInstituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7123-7924
Jake M MartinDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9544-9094
Amelia MunsonDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Giovanni PolverinoSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9737-7995
Bob B M WongSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9352-6500
Michael G BertramDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5320-8444

Funding

Australian Research CouncilForrest Research Foundation FellowshipItalian Ministry of University and ResearchKempestiftelsernaSvenska Forskningsrådet Formas
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystems around the globe are under unprecedented pressure from human activities. Chemical pollution and biological invasions are two leading drivers of environmental change, each of which causes substantial harm to wildlife and the ecosystems they inhabit. However, despite their individual impacts being well-documented, the combined effects of these pervasive environmental pressures are seldom studied. Here, we address this critical gap by first examining the potential interactions between chemical pollution and biological invasions in animals. We then discuss possible impacts of chemical pollution on animals-both invasive and native-across the distinct stages of the invasion process. Further, we examine gaps in our current understanding of the potential interactions between chemical pollution and biological invasions, including the role of pollutants in mediating interactions between native and non-native species, how pollutants may influence the potential for the invasion process to act as a selective filter, and the relevance of phenotypic plasticity and behavioural syndromes in this context. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying key research gaps, this review underscores the importance of considering chemical pollution and biological invasions in combination in ecological research. Understanding the combined impacts of these widespread and frequently co-occurring phenomena is essential for developing effective conservation and restoration measures in an increasingly human-modified world.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsEnvironmental PollutionIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsEcosystemEnvironmental Pollutantscontaminantdirect and indirect effectsecological impactecotoxicologyinvasive speciestoxicity

Identifiers

PMID41120002
PMCPMC12539962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.