ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Accelerated evolution increased craniofacial divergence between humans and great apes.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The craniofacial shape of modern humans embodies genomic signatures of evolution, diversity, and clinical conditions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Accelerated evolution increased craniofacial divergence between humans and great apes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The level of craniofacial diversity of hominids (the group that includes great apes and humans) is much higher than that of their sister group, the hylobatids (also known as gibbons or lesser apes), despite the similar timeline of diversification and a similar level of genetic differentiation between the two clades. To shed light on the evolutionary dynamics shaping these varying levels of craniofacial diversity, we used three-dimensional high-density geometric morphometric approaches and phylogenetic comparative methods. We show that neurocranial diversity exceeds that expected from neutral evolution in the great apes with respect to the gibbons, whereas facial diversity does not. These results indicate that neurocranial diversity across the great apes has been shaped by genus-specific neurocognitive, social or ecological selective pressures that are not observed in the gibbons, whose neurocranial diversity is constrained by stabilizing selection and gene flow. However, facial diversity results from similar evolutionary dynamics across both clades. Within this general pattern of differences and similarities between the great and lesser apes, humans emerge as the only species that consistently shows the highest evolutionary rate across almost all craniofacial regions in both males and females, thus pointing to strong human-specific selective pressures in neurocranial and facial evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.