Observational studyAnnals of medicine2025
Clinical and laboratory predictors of mortality in
Observational study in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiological profile and 28-day mortality prediction model for bloodstream infection in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Impact of a standardized management protocol and antimicrobial stewardship intervention on mortality and quality of care in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a before-after study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Characterization of a Novel Endolysin Sb1-LysAEJ as a Biocide and Food-contact Surface Disinfectant for the Control of Staphylococcus aureus.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Microbial and host innate immune factors affecting the persistence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for hospital mortality in adult patients withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of 150 adult patients diagnosed with monomicrobial SAB between November 2023 and November 2024 at a tertiary care center. The predictive value of PBS, SOFA, NLR, and PLR for in-hospital mortality was assessed using ROC analysis and logistic regression.
resultsThe overall in-hospital mortality rate was 46%. PBS >4 and NLR >21 were independently associated with increased mortality (OR 11.72 and 6.36, respectively;
conclusionHigh PBS and NLR are strong and independent predictors of mortality in SAB. As this study was conducted in a high-risk cohort with a considerable proportion of critically ill and immunocompromised patients, the findings are particularly relevant to this vulnerable population. External validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is required to confirm their generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.