Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41118642›Full record

Trial reportJMIR formative research2025

A Sexual Health Self-Management Intervention (Psychosexual Educational Partners Program) for Couples With a History of Breast and Gynecological Cancer: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

Noël M Arring, Jennifer Barsky Reese, Carolyn Lafferty, Debra L Barton, Jeanne Carter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05070299 (Developing a Psychosexual Educational Partners Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05070299 nacompletednot on this map

Developing a Psychosexual Educational Partners Program: PEPP A Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterRan2022 to 2022Enrolled18ConditionsBreast Cancer, Gynecologic CancerArmsPsychosexual Educational Partner Program (PEPP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noël M ArringCollege of Nursing, University of Tennessee at Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2824-6064
Jennifer Barsky ReeseCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9341-2407
Carolyn LaffertyCollege of Nursing, University of Tennessee at Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0849-3893
Debra L BartonCollege of Nursing, University of Tennessee at Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6624-3476
Jeanne CarterGynecology Service, Department of Surgery and Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3553-5024

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with breast or gynecological cancer and their intimate partners often face sexual problems in their relationships. Accessing care for sexual health problems is challenging for several reasons (eg, limited trained health care providers and privacy concerns), making self-management approaches highly promising.

objectiveThis study assessed the feasibility of the Psychosexual Educational Partners Program (PEPP), a 6-week sexual health self-management intervention for women treated for breast or gynecological cancer and their intimate partners.

methodsA mixed methods single-arm, repeated measures design was used for this study. An attrition rate of ≤25% was considered feasible. Intervention experiences were assessed via interviews, and preliminary effects on the Dyadic Sexual Communication Scale, relationship quality measured by the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and sexual health measured by PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction version 2.0 were explored quantitatively.

resultsIn total, 7 (77%) of the 9 couples completed the study through week 6 and provided both pre- and poststudy data, resulting in an attrition rate of 22% (2/9), which met the feasibility benchmark for attrition of 25% or less. The following two themes emerged: (1) PEPP helped us start difficult conversations and impacted emotional and physical intimacy. The intervention adherence was 85%. Dyadic Sexual Communication Scale scores improved with a mean change score of 6.64 (SD 9.65) and a Cohen d of 0.69. Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale scores declined slightly, with a mean change score of -0.93 (SD 3.41) and a Cohen d of 0.27. PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction version 2.0 scores showed small improvements for women on desire, with a mean change score of 2.36 (SD 6.24) and a Cohen d of 0.38. Similarly, for women, the satisfaction mean change score was 2.20 (SD 8.22) and a Cohen d of 0.27. For intimate partners, a small effect was found for desire, but in this instance, desire decreased with a mean change score of -1.57 (SD 6.09) and a Cohen d of 0.26.

conclusionsThe findings support PEPP as a feasible intervention for improving sexual communication. If proven effective in a randomized controlled trial, it has the potential to address the critical gap in supportive care among female cancer survivors.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05070299; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05070299.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleSelf-ManagementSexual HealthSexual PartnersAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedbreast cancercancercouples-baseddyadgynecological canceroncologypartnersself-managementsexual communicationsexual health

Identifiers

PMID41118642
PMCPMC12587013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.