ArticleJMIR research protocols2025
Implementation of Integrative Nursing for Patients With Cancer Receiving Inpatient Care: Protocol for a Convergent Parallel Mixed Methods Evaluation.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntegrative nursing (IN) involves the application of external naturopathic nursing interventions, such as compresses, embrocations, and therapeutic baths and washes. As part of a university hospital project, patients receiving oncology care in participating wards receive IN interventions as supportive care during their hospital stay as part of a consultation service.
objectiveThis study aims to investigate the acceptance, feasibility, and contextual conditions of implementing IN in inpatient care and to evaluate perceptions, experiences, and perceived impact of IN interventions from multiple stakeholder perspectives.
methodsWe used a convergent parallel mixed methods approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. The evaluation consists of 5 substudies reflecting multiple perspectives on the project. Patients, relatives, and hospital staff will participate. Substudies include a single-arm pre-post questionnaire (substudy 1) and semistructured interviews (substudy 2) with patients, a cross-sectional survey of relatives (substudy 3), semistructured interviews with health care professionals (substudy 4), and analysis of project-related documentation (substudy 5). Qualitative data will be analyzed using qualitative content analysis, and quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods.
resultsFollowing separate analyses of each substudy, the findings will be integrated and triangulated to generate overarching meta-inferences. The recruitment phase lasted from October 2023 to January 2025. Data collection was completed in March 2025. As of October 2025, after data verification and plausibility checks, data analysis is ongoing. The first results are expected to be published in 2026.
conclusionsThis study presents a mixed methods research protocol aimed at exploring the implementation of IN within a university hospital setting. It is expected to provide a theory-based contribution to IN implementation in inpatient care while also offering insights into its potential effects at the patient level. The study is anticipated to advance understanding of how IN can be sustainably embedded in hospital practice and to provide actionable insights for improving patient-centered supportive care.
trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00032318; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00032318. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/74405.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.