ArticleBlood advances2026
Familial clusters and clinical features, complications, and outcomes in 1000 patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractApproximately 20% of patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) report family history (FH) of hematologic malignancies. However, the impact of FH on patient outcomes remains unclear. We included 1000 patients with WM to determine the relationship between FH, characteristics, complications, and treatment outcomes. Data collected included clinical features at diagnosis, complications (Bing-Neel syndrome [BNS], aggressive transformation, AL [light chain] amyloidosis, and neuropathy), FH cluster (WM [WM-FH], other B-cell FH [B-FH], non-B-cell FH [NON-B-FH], and sporadic [NO-FH]), and treatment outcomes. Logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the odds of complications. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups evaluated using the log-rank test. Proportional hazards Cox regression models were fitted to determine the impact of WM-FH on time to first treatment (TTFT), overall survival (OS), and survival after first treatment initiation (SAFTI). The NO-FH group was the reference group for the regression analyses. The median follow-up time from diagnosis was 13 years. There were more women in the WM-FH than in the NO-FH group (50% vs 34%; P< .01). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, WM-FH was associated with higher odds of BNS (odds ratio [OR], 3.90; P = .005) and lower odds of neuropathy (OR, 0.49; P = .03) than NO-FH. The median TTFT was 0.7 years, OS was 23 years, and SAFTI was 20.5 years for all patients. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, WM-FH did not affect TTFT, SAFTI, or OS. Our study suggests higher odds of BNS and lower odds of neuropathy in patients with WM-FH but no impact of WM-FH on TTFT, OS, or SAFTI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.