Trial reportBlood2026
CPX-351 in Down syndrome-associated myeloid leukemia: results and prognostic factors from the phase 3 ML-DS 2018 trial.
Trial report in Blood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of Pathogens in the Gut Microbiome Prior to Bloodstream Infection in Children with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Mature B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2026Article
- Lineage-restricted dependency on an oncofetal SNHG29-IGF2BP1 RNA axis in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Advances in ligand-targeted nanodelivery systems for leukemia therapy: from single- to dual-ligand strategies.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractMyeloid leukemia of Down syndrome (ML-DS) is associated with an excellent prognosis but high treatment-related toxicity and mortality. The Phase 3 Clinical Trial for CPX-351 in ML-DS 2018 aimed to maintain the excellent event-free survival (EFS) achieved in the previous ML-DS 2006 trial while reducing the treatment intensity. Intensity-reduced induction and reinduction therapy with cytarabine and idarubicin with or without etoposide was replaced with CPX-351 (66 U/m2 on 3 days in course 1 and on 2 days in course 2). Risk stratification was based on flow cytometric measurable residual disease (MRD) after first induction. High-risk patients received high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m2 per 12 hour) in consolidation; standard-risk patients received cytarabine at a dose of 1 g/m2 per 12 hour. A total of 35 patients were enrolled until the trial was halted because of an unexpectedly high relapse rate. A per-protocol interim analysis revealed a significantly lower 24-month EFS when compared with the ML-DS 2006 trial (69% vs 90%; P< .001). In contrast with previous studies, most patients who relapsed responded to salvage therapy, leading to a comparable 24-month overall survival of 88% (vs 92%; P = .612). CPX-351 demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile with no treatment-related mortality. Positive MRD by error-corrected GATA1 next-generation sequencing, the presence of trisomy 8 or a complex karyotype were associated with an increased risk for relapse. In conclusion, replacing intensity-reduced induction therapy with CPX-351 in ML-DS led to a significantly lower EFS, highlighting the need for dose optimization to balance the efficacy and toxicity in this sensitive patient population. This trial was registered at https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu as EudraCT #2018-002988-25.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.