Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41118429›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Machine learning-driven Diabetes Health Tracer (DHT): Optimizing prognosis using RaSK_GraDe and RaSK_GraDeL models.

Muhammad Noman, Maria Hanif, Abdul Hameed, Muhammad Babar, Basit Qureshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad NomanDepartment of Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, Iqra University, H-9, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Maria HanifDepartment of Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, Iqra University, H-9, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Abdul HameedDepartment of Computer Science, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-1241
Muhammad BabarRobotics and Internet of Things Laboratory, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6653-6076
Basit QureshiCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus presents a significant global health challenge, particularly in regions like Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh. Machine learning (ML) techniques offer promising solutions for diabetes prediction, surpassing traditional methods in reliability and efficiency. This research conducts a comparative analysis of ML algorithms including Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Gradient Boosting (GB), RaSK_GraDe (Proposed Voting), and RaSK_GraDeL (Proposed Stacking). Evaluation is performed using datasets, such as PIMA Indian, Frankfurt Hospitals Diabetes, RTML with Insulin, and the proposed Diabetes Health Tracer (DHT) dataset comprising 2877 observations with nine features. Data pre-processing techniques address missing values, outliers, normalization, and class balancing (SMOTE), enhancing model robustness. Hyperparameter tuning via cross-validation and Random Search optimizes model performance. Additionally, ensemble methods-Voting Classifier (RaSK GraDe) and Stacking Model (RaSK GraDeL with Logistic Regression) are applied, achieving notable accuracies of 98.03% and 98.55%, respectively, on the DHT dataset. The study underscores ML's potential in diabetes prediction, advocating for personalized treatment and healthcare management advancements.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusMachine LearningAlgorithmsBangladeshDecision TreesHumansIndiaPakistanPrognosisSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID41118429
PMCPMC12539721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.