ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Homeostatic bidirectional plasticity in upbound and downbound micromodules in a model of the olivocerebellar loop.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Olivocerebellar learning is highly adaptable, unfolding over minutes to weeks depending on the task. However, the stabilizing mechanisms of the synaptic dynamics necessary for ongoing learning remain unclear. We constructed a model to examine plasticity dynamics under stochastic input and investigate the impact of inferior olive (IO) reverberations on Purkinje cell (PCs) activity and synaptic plasticity. We explored Upbound and Downbound cerebellar micromodules, which are organized loops of IO neurons, cerebellar nuclei neurons and microzones of PCs characterized by their unique molecular profiles and different levels of baseline firing. Our findings show synaptic weight convergence followed by stability of synaptic weights. In line with their relatively low and high intrinsic firing, we observed that Upbound and Downbound PCs have a propensity for potentiation and depression, respectively, with both PC types reaching stability at differential levels of overall strength of their parallel-fiber (PF) inputs. The oscillations and coupling of IO neurons participating in the Upbound and Downbound modules determine at which frequency band PFs can be stabilized optimally. Our results indicate that specific frequency components drive IO resonance and synchronicity, which, in turn, regulate temporal patterning across Upbound and Downbound zones, orchestrating their plasticity dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.