Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41118407›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Optimizing network bandwidth slicing identification: NADAM-enhanced CNN and VAE data preprocessing for enhanced interpretability.

Md Fahim Ul Islam, Shahriar Hossain, Md Golam Rabiul Alam, Nafees Mansoor, Amitabha Chakrabarty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Fahim Ul IslamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shahriar HossainDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6132-1305
Md Golam Rabiul AlamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9054-7557
Nafees MansoorDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh (ULAB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3408-237X
Amitabha ChakrabartyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0306-4029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication networks of the future will rely heavily on network slicing (NS), a technology that enables the creation of distinct virtual networks within a shared physical infrastructure. This capability is critical for meeting the diverse quality of service (QoS) requirements of various applications, from ultra-reliable low-latency communications to massive IoT deployments. To achieve efficient network slicing, intelligent algorithms are essential for optimizing network resources and ensuring QoS. Artificial Intelligence (AI) models, particularly deep learning techniques, have emerged as powerful tools for automating and enhancing network slicing processes. These models are increasingly applied in next-generation mobile and wireless networks, including 5G, IoT infrastructure, and software-defined networking (SDN), to allocate resources and manage network slices dynamically. In this paper, we propose an Interpretable Network Bandwidth Slicing Identification (INBSI) system that leverages a modified Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture with Nesterov-accelerated Adaptive Moment Estimation (NADAM) optimization. Additionally, we use a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) for preprocessing initial data, along with reconstructed data for data validity assessment. The model we propose outperforms other alternatives and reaches an accuracy peak of (84%) in the system environment. A range of accuracy was achieved by (k-nearest neighbors algorithm) KNN (76%), Random Forest (69%), BaggingClassifier (70%), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GaussianNB) (55%). The accuracy of additional methods varies, including Decision Trees, AdaBoost, Deep Neural Forest (DNF), and Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs). We utilize two eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), to provide insight into the impact of certain input characteristics on the network slicing process. Our work highlights the potential of AI-driven solutions in network slicing, offering insights for operators to optimize resource allocation and enhance future network management.

Indexed as

Computer Communication NetworksNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningSoftwareWireless Technology

Identifiers

PMID41118407
PMCPMC12539723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.