Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41118398›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Beyond potency: A proposed lexicon for sensory differentiation of Cannabis sativa L. aroma.

Solomon E Isaacson, Adrianne R Wilson-Poe, Tingting Ye, Yanping L Qian, Thomas H Shellhammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Solomon E IsaacsonDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2598-1056
Adrianne R Wilson-PoeDow Neurobiology, Legacy Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Tingting YeDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Yanping L QianDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7356-6051
Thomas H ShellhammerDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4055-2366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aroma is a critical factor in consumer-perceived quality of Cannabis sativa L., yet standardized tools for describing the aromatic diversity of uncombusted Cannabis inflorescence are lacking. This study generated and evaluated a descriptive aroma lexicon for intact Cannabis inflorescence consisting of 25 terms with defined reference standards. A human panel evaluated 91 samples using a Check-All-That-Apply method. Multivariate analyses demonstrated the lexicon's ability to differentiate samples based on orthonasal aroma. Type I and III Cannabis exhibited overlapping sensory profiles, though type I (high THC, low CBD) was more frequently described as skunky, musty, and animalic, whereas type III (low THC, high CBD) had higher frequencies of citrus, fruity, and candy-like aromas. Terpene profiling revealed clear chemical clusters, but terpene profiles alone poorly predicted sensory character. Terpinolene was the only compound consistently associated with sensory descriptors, specifically citrus and chemical. In type III samples, 43 volatile sulfur compounds were detected via gas chromatography with a pulsed flame photometric detector, including dimethyl sulfide, methional, and dimethyl trisulfide while others were tentatively identified or novel. However, neither terpene nor volatile sulfur compound profiles strongly predicted sensory perception. These results emphasize the limitations of chemical composition as a proxy for aroma quality. This work establishes a foundation for future research linking aroma, chemistry, and consumer preferences, and supports the development of quality metrics beyond delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol potency.

Indexed as

CannabisOdorantsAdultFemaleHumansMaleTerpenesVolatile Organic CompoundsTerpenesVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID41118398
PMCPMC12539713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.