SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Clinical outcomes of chikungunya across age groups: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autoantibodies neutralizing type I interferons underlie a third of cases of Chikungunya virus encephalitis or myelitis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Chikungunya Vaccines in Travel Medicine: From Regulatory Approval to Real-World Challenges.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Review
- Cluster of imported chikungunya virus infections in travelers returning from Seychelles to Berlin, December 2025-April 2026.New microbes and new infections · 2026Article
- Dengue and chikungunya virus transmission in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Genomic epidemiology reveals the origins and transmission dynamics of chikungunya virus in China.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2026Article
- Epidemiology, transmission, vector and factors analysis of chikungunya outbreak in 2025, Quanzhou City of China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Immune features and clinical characteristics of chikungunya fever in children: differences from adults and across pediatric age groups.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Validation of China's 2025 high-risk criteria in RT-PCR-confirmed chikungunya inpatients: a single-centre retrospective cohort.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChikungunya, caused by a mosquito-borne alphavirus, has emerged as a major public health concern due to its expanding geographical range and debilitating health outcomes in affected populations. Although research on chikungunya is growing, variations in the clinical presentation between age groups remain poorly understood. Understanding these variations is crucial for appropriate diagnoses, treatments, and timely prevention efforts. Therefore, this study aims to assess the clinical presentation of chikungunya across age groups and identify age-related differences and similarities. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe conducted a systematic literature review (17-09-2024) using Embase, MEDLINE, and gray literature, including a risk of bias assessment (Downs and Black, National Institute of Health). Results were descriptively presented. A total of 101 studies reported clinical outcomes in three age groups: children (<18 years), adults (18-64 years), and the elderly (≥65 years), with fourteen directly comparing age groups. The findings highlight substantial differences in disease presentation. Hospitalization and mortality rates were highest among the elderly and younger children, while faster recovery was reported for older children compared to other age groups. Symptom presentation also varied by age, with rash and headache being more common in adolescents and adults than in younger children and the elderly. Fever was more prevalent among adults and the elderly compared with children. Arthralgia was less commonly reported in children and the elderly than in adults, warranting attention for potential misdiagnosis due to atypical disease presentation. Lastly, the occurrence of chronic chikungunya symptoms appears to increase with age. Yet, the heterogeneity in reporting and scarcity of articles describing clinical features of children and the elderly limit definitive conclusions. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings highlight the age-related variations in chikungunya disease presentation, reinforcing the need for tailored diagnostics, clinical management, and prevention strategies in all age groups. By identifying these differences, our study helps guide future research and public health policies aimed at reducing the impact of chikungunya worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.