ArticlePloS one2025
Research on grape leaf classification based on optimized densenet201 model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the realm of plant classification, the classification of grape leaf varieties has long presented a complex challenge. Aiming to enhance the accuracy and generalization ability of grape leaf variety classification, this study proposes a novel approach that employs an optimized Densenet201 model for grape leaf classification. Initially, grape leaf images from five distinct varieties were meticulously collected to construct a comprehensive grape leaf dataset. To augment the diversity of the dataset, the parameters of data augmentation were delicately adjusted, with an increase in the rotation range, translation range, and so on. Subsequently, BatchNormalization and GlobalAveragePooling2D layers were incorporated to achieve feature normalization and pooling. Simultaneously, the parameters of the Dropout layer were optimized to effectively mitigate the issue of overfitting. Additionally, the number of neurons and layers in the Dense layer were varied to explore diverse network structures and pursue superior performance. Moreover, the parameters of the Adam optimizer were meticulously tuned to attain the optimal performance, and the model's performance was further enhanced by extracting image features. The experimental results demonstrate that, in comparison with the densenet121, densenet169, resnet50, and densenet201 models, the optimized Densenet201 model showcases outstanding performance in grape leaf variety classification, remarkably improving the classification accuracy and generalization ability. This research provides a more efficient method for grape leaf variety classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.