SynthesisHepatology communications2025
The impact of food insecurity on chronic liver disease: A systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Hepatology communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Roll-Out Implementation Optimization (ROIO) trial to develop and test the implementation of a food security screening and referral process: a study protocol.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Liver disease care amid wars and conflicts.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Article
- Social needs screening in hepatology clinic: a qualitative study of patient experience.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Defining the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) research agenda: A Delphi consensus project.Hepatology communications · 2026Article
- The "viral-metabolic" interaction mechanisms and management challenges in chronic hepatitis B combined with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: from clinical evidence to an integrated multidisciplinary framework.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic liver disease (CLD) poses a significant healthcare burden, with diet playing a crucial role in its management. Food insecurity, defined as limited or uncertain access to adequate food, may worsen liver disease outcomes due to reliance on nutrient-poor diets. While its association with chronic conditions is well-established, its impact on liver disease remains underexplored. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the impact of food insecurity on liver disease development, progression, and outcomes, identifying gaps and informing future research and public health strategies.
methodsDatabases including Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were searched comprehensively through April 2025. Studies evaluating food insecurity and liver disease outcomes were included. Data on study design, population, definitions, and findings were extracted. Quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
resultsOf 17,609 studies identified, 17 met the inclusion criteria, predominantly from the United States. Most studies focused on metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Food insecurity was linked to increased odds of MASLD, advanced fibrosis, and mortality, with higher rates of hepatic steatosis, liver stiffness, and fibrosis progression in both pediatric and adult populations. Food insecurity was measured primarily using the USDA Household Food Security Survey Module, and liver outcomes via noninvasive techniques and biomarkers.
conclusionsFood insecurity is a potentially modifiable risk factor for liver disease progression, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Further research should explore food assistance interventions, its impact on diet and implement screening programs in hepatology clinics to inform tailored strategies addressing this critical determinant of liver health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.