ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Establishment of an Integrated Model for Predicting Compound Mutagenicity with a Feature Importance Analysis.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- LMF-CP: An Interpretable Multimodal Late-Fusion Framework for Compound Carcinogenicity Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing the mutagenicity of chemical compounds is crucial for ensuring their safety and minimizing potential environmental and public health risks. However, traditional mutagenicity assessments, such as the Ames test, are time-consuming, resource-intensive, and often limited in their capacity to screen a large number of compounds. To address this gap, predictive models powered by deep learning offer a promising alternative for rapid and cost-effective mutagenicity screening. In this study, we propose an integrated deep learning framework utilizing diverse molecular features to predict compound mutagenicity. In the total usage of 5866 compounds, 5279 compounds were utilized for model training, and the other 587 compounds were utilized for model evaluation. A total of 78 integrated models were developed by systematically combining 13 types of molecular descriptors and fingerprints. The MACCS-Mordred model demonstrated the best performance, achieving a balanced accuracy of 0.885 and a precision score of 0.922 in the testing data set. In addition, we performed an activity cliff analysis to examine potential sources of mispredictions. Applicability domain analysis further confirmed the robustness of the model, indicating that most compounds in our data set fell within the reliable prediction space. Notably, feature importance analysis revealed that mutagenic compounds are more likely to contain nitrogen-containing and ring-related substructures, offering insights into structural characteristics associated with mutagenic risk. Our results support AI-enabled screening tools for prioritizing hazardous compounds and improving early stage chemical risk assessment. This work provides practical value for environmental monitoring and regulatory decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.