Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41118109›Full record

ArticleLifetime data analysis2025

Modelling dependent censoring in time-to-event data using boosting copula regression.

Annika Strömer, Nadja Klein, Ingrid Van Keilegom, Andreas Mayr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lifetime data analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annika StrömerDepartment of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. annika.stroemer@uni-marburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1284-3318
Nadja KleinScientific Computing Center, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5072-5347
Ingrid Van KeilegomORSTAT, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8827-7642
Andreas MayrDepartment of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7106-9732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival analysis plays a pivotal role across disciplines, including engineering, economics, and social sciences—not just in biomedical research. In many of these applications, incomplete observations due to censoring are common, arising from limited follow-up periods, study dropouts, or administrative constraints. A standard assumption in such settings is that the censoring mechanism is independent of the survival process. This assumption primarily holds when censoring occurs at the end of the observation period. However, there may be dependence between event and censoring times. For example, if a patient’s health deteriorates and they withdraw due to poor prognosis, the time of censoring depends on their health status, leading to dependent censoring as sicker patients are censored earlier. To address such situations adequately in statistical analyses, we propose a model-based boosting approach using distributional copula regression. Our approach models the joint distribution of survival and censoring times by linking unknown marginal distributions through an unknown parametric copula. All distribution parameters of the resulting joint distribution are estimated simultaneously as functions of potentially different covariates. A key merit of the boosting approach is its data-driven variable selection, which is particularly important for such flexible models. Estimation remains feasible even for high-dimensional data with more covariates than observations, where classical estimation frameworks meet their limits. To investigate the performance of our method, we conduct a comprehensive simulation study, and demonstrate its practical application using a recent observational study analyzing the overall survival of patients with colon cancer. The data has a high proportion of right-censored observations without information on the cause of censoring.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansRegression AnalysisSurvival AnalysisCopulaDistributional regressionGradient boostingSurvival analysisVariable selection

Identifiers

PMID41118109
PMCPMC12586418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.