ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025
Addressing potentially inappropriate prescribing in care homes: regional evaluation of a pharmacist-led model in Northern Ireland.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of medication safety recommendations: focus groups with stakeholders.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPotentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) increases the risk for medication-related harm amongst older adults, with those in long-term care at particular risk.
aimThis study sought to evaluate a medicines optimisation pharmacist case management model for older adults in care homes in Northern Ireland (NI).
methodSecondary analysis of prospective data collected during the case management model delivered to older adults (≥ 65 years) across 32 care homes in NI (N = 1,095). Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) scores were compared at baseline and post-intervention. Variability in MAI per medication score change (ΔMAI) was examined using multiple linear regression. Multiple logistic and Poisson regressions examined potential associations between ΔMAI and secondary outcomes, including unplanned hospital admissions (all-cause); general practitioner (GP) call-outs; out-of-hours (OOH) GP call-outs; and emergency department (ED) visits.
resultsPIP was highly prevalent at baseline (83.5%; n = 914). A significant reduction in MAI (per medication) score was observed from pre to post-intervention; 82% (n = 898) of participants experienced some MAI score improvement. Overall, 3,044 clinical interventions were delivered; 2,062 medications were stopped, 141 medications were started, and 438 dosages were changed. Several unexpected significant associations were observed between ΔMAI and GP call-outs during follow-up; sensitivity analyses suggested these findings were likely due to confounding. No association was observed between ΔMAI (per medication) and likelihood for unplanned hospital admission.
conclusionPIP is highly prevalent in NI care homes and was significantly reduced by a medicine optimisation pharmacist case management model. Clinical pharmacist input in long-term care is warranted to lessen medication-related harm for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41118061What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.