SynthesisInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025
Effectiveness and safety of different antiplatelet therapies for minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionApproximately one-third of patients with minor ischemic stroke (MIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) fail to achieve functional independence due to stroke progression or recurrent stroke. Identifying effective secondary prevention strategies is crucial to reduce morbidity, mortality, and disability.
aimThis systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various antiplatelet therapies using network meta-analysis and to identify the optimal treatment option for patients with MIS or high-risk TIA.
methodStudies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to August 29, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing antiplatelet treatments for MIS or high-risk TIA were included through consensus. The primary outcome was recurrent strokes. The secondary outcomes included recurrent ischemic strokes and a composite outcome combining ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death. The safety outcomes included intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), any bleeding events, and all-cause mortality. Treatments were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative rank curve (SUCRA).
resultsNineteen studies, including 12 RCTs and seven observational studies with 90,483 patients, were analyzed. Compared with aspirin or other mono antiplatelet therapies, both dual antiplatelet therapies of clopidogrel plus aspirin and ticagrelor plus aspirin reduced the risk of recurrent strokes, recurrent ischemic strokes, and the composite outcome without increasing the risk of ICH or all-cause mortality. However, ticagrelor plus aspirin significantly increased the risk of any bleeding. This treatment had the highest SUCRA score (0.97) for the primary outcome and the lowest (0.01) for any bleeding.
conclusionBased on the combined results of effectiveness and safety, clopidogrel plus aspirin may be the optimal choice. However, for patients with a low bleeding risk, ticagrelor plus aspirin serves as an appropriate alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41118059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.