Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41118052›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2026

Oral Minoxidil for Alopecia Treatment: Risks, Benefits, and Recommendations.

Michael M Ong, Yingjoy Li, Shari R Lipner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael M OngWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0809-4320
Yingjoy LiIrvine School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3989-8551
Shari R LipnerDepartment of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1305 York Ave, 9th floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA. shl9032@med.cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5913-9304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-dose oral minoxidil has gained recognition as an off-label treatment for hair loss disorders, including androgenetic alopecia, telogen effluvium, and alopecia areata. Originally developed to treat hypertension, its hair growth-promoting effects are attributed to multiple mechanisms: primarily through direct KATP channel activation in dermal papilla cells, with additional effects from Wnt/β-catenin signaling, enhanced cysteine incorporation, and modulation of inflammatory and androgenic pathways. Clinical studies demonstrate comparable efficacy to topical minoxidil, with the added advantages of improved adherence, lower cost, and reduced application-related side effects. Common adverse effects include dose-dependent hypertrichosis (24% incidence), transient shedding (16-22%), and mild peripheral edema (2%), while serious complications, including pericardial effusion, are rare at doses used for alopecia. International Delphi consensus supports standardized dosing: 1.25 mg/day starting dose for women (range 0.625-5 mg/day) and 2.5 mg/day for men (range 1.25-5 mg/day), with lower doses recommended for adolescents and caution advised in renal/hepatic impairment. Contraindications include pericardial disease, uncontrolled hypertension, and pregnancy. While current evidence supports its safety and efficacy, further research is needed to establish long-term outcomes and optimal use in pediatric populations. With appropriate monitoring, oral minoxidil represents a promising therapeutic option in the management of hair loss disorders.

Indexed as

AlopeciaMinoxidilAdministration, OralDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleOff-Label UsePractice Guidelines as TopicRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeMinoxidil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.