Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41118035›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection2025

Adalimumab in non-infectious uveitis, towards a real-world therapeutic paradigm beyond inflammation control: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

Carmen Antía Rodríguez-Fernández, Lorena Rodriguez-Martínez, Olalla Rodríguez Lemos, Begoña de Domingo, Pere García Bru, Antía Gestoso, Stephanie Romeo, Patricia González-Berdullas, Bahram Bodaghi, Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carmen Antía Rodríguez-Fernández *FarmaCHUSLab Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain.
Lorena Rodriguez-Martínez *FarmaCHUSLab Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain.
Olalla Rodríguez LemosOphthalmology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Vigo (SERGAS), Vigo, 36213, Spain.
Begoña de DomingoOphthalmology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain.
Pere García BruDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Spain.
Antía GestosoOphthalmology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Vigo (SERGAS), Vigo, 36213, Spain.
Stephanie RomeoOphthalmology Department, University Hospital Complex of Ferrol (SERGAS), Ferrol, 15405, Spain.
Patricia González-BerdullasFarmaCHUSLab Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain.
Bahram BodaghiDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, IHU FOReSIGHT, APHP Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Anxo Fernández-FerreiroFarmaCHUSLab Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain. anxordes@gmail.com.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI20/00719Xunta de Galicia IN606B-2023/004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the real-world long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in refractory non-infectious uveitis (NIU), analyzing clinical outcomes, treatment adjustments, and the potential role of ADA trough levels (ADA TL) in therapeutic response. By identifying factors influencing response, our study aims to contribute to a more personalized approach.

methodsA multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in NIU patients receiving ADA for ≥ 6 months. Disease activity was defined using the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria, and patients were categorized as responders (R) or non-responders (NR). The study assessed corticosteroid (CS) and immunosuppressive therapy adjustments, relapse rates, adverse events (AEs), patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), and the relationship between serum ADA TL, anti-drug antibodies (AAA), and clinical response.

resultsA total of 52 patients (91 eyes) with a median disease duration of 6.5 years (IQR 3.0–11.5) were included. Anterior uveitis was the most frequent subtype (34.6%), followed by panuveitis (26.9%), posterior (25%) and intermediate uveitis (13.5%). ADA therapy resulted in a significant reduction in systemic CS and c-DMADs. At the study visit, 65.4% of patients achieved complete inflammatory quiescence, with anterior (OR = 0.06, P = 0.009) and posterior uveitis (OR = 0.11, P = 0.04), being associated with a higher likelihood of response. ADA TL and AAA did not correlate with clinical response (median [IQR]: R = 8.5 [3.9–14.8] µg/mL vs. NR = 10.3 [7.9–14.5] µg/mL). AEs were reported by 32.7% of patients, predominantly mild-to-moderate infections, fatigue, and headaches. No significant differences in efficacy, safety, or relapse rates were observed between original ADA and biosimilars.

conclusionsOriginal ADA and biosimilars demonstrate long-term effectiveness and safety in NIU, reducing the need for systemic therapy, with comparable effectiveness and safety. PROMs further revealed that improvements in vision-related QoL were primarily driven by general vision perception, underscoring the subjective impact of treatment beyond objective inflammation control. While serum ADA levels were influenced by some clinical variables, they did not correlate with response to treatment.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAnti‑TNF‑alphaBiosimilarsIntraocular inflammationNon infectious uveitisPatient reported outcomesPersonalized medicineReal life experienceTrough levels

Identifiers

PMID41118035
PMCPMC12540958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.