Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41118034›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

EGFR gene amplification in IDH-wildtype glioblastomas: an integrative bioinformatic and histopathological analysis using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Anass Oukhdouch, Basma Zinbi, Souad Sellami, Hanane Rais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anass OukhdouchMorphoscience Research laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, Morocco. a.oukhdouch.ced@uca.ac.ma.
Basma ZinbiAnatomic Pathology Department, University Hospital Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco.
Souad SellamiAnatomic Pathology Department, University Hospital Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco.
Hanane RaisMorphoscience Research laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, Morocco. ha.rais@uca.ac.ma.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, characterized by marked histopathological features such as high proliferative activity, mitoses, necrosis, and microvascular proliferation (MVP), as well as extensive molecular heterogeneity. Among key molecular alterations, EGFR amplification and MGMT promoter methylation hold significant diagnostic and prognostic relevance. In this study, we performed a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis of EGFR and conducted a correlation analysis of EGFR amplification in a cohort of 19 GBM samples using standard fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). These results were further correlated with established molecular hallmarks of glioblastoma.

methodsWe analyzed mRNA expression profiles of EGFR family genes using publicly available datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) databases. Additionally, we utilized multiple online bioinformatics platforms, including GEPIA, TIMER, TISIDB repository, cBioPortal, Metascape, and GeneMANIA, to explore the expression patterns, immune cell infiltration, correlation of EGFR amplification with immunomodulatory and prognostic significance of the EGFR family in glioblastoma. EGFR amplification and protein expression were assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively. MGMT promoter methylation was determined by methylation-specific qPCR (MS-qPCR).

resultsBioinformatic analyses revealed that EGFR and ERBB2 were overexpressed and associated with poor prognosis, while ERBB3 and ERBB4 exhibited decreased expression in GBM compared to normal brain tissue. Immune infiltrating level correlation of EGFR family, revealed that EGFR and ERBB4 expression were positively correlated with various immune cell infiltrates in glioblastoma, particularly CD8 + T cells, macrophages, and B cells. Additionally, EGFR expression was negatively correlated with key co-stimulatory molecules including CD28, CD40, CD70, and IL2RA, no significant associations were found with classical immune checkpoints such as PD-L1 and CTLA-4, though EGFR was inversely correlated with TGFBR1. Subtype analysis showed elevated EGFR expression in Classical-like and Mesenchymal-like GBM subtypes, and a trend toward higher levels in the lymphocyte-depleted immune subtype. Genomic analysis revealed that EGFR family alterations in 49% of GBM cases, with EGFR amplification being the most frequent and linked to poorer overall survival. Enrichment and the PPI network analyses demonstrated that the EGFR family is deeply involved in tumorigenic pathways, particularly PI3K/AKT signaling, integrin interactions, and growth factor receptor cascades. We found that EGFR amplification was detected in 36.84% of cases and was significantly associated with EGFR protein overexpression (IHC score 3+). MGMT promoter methylation was present in 47.4% of cases. No significant association was found between EGFR amplification and MGMT methylation, ATRX, or p53 status.

conclusionOur integrative bioinformatics and histopathological analyses highlight EGFR as a central oncogenic driver and potential immunomodulatory factor in GBM. EGFR amplification correlates with poor prognosis, immune dysregulation, underscoring its utility as both a diagnostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target in GBM management.

Indexed as

BioinformaticEGFR amplificationFISHGlioblastomaPrognostic biomarkerTumor microenvirment

Identifiers

PMID41118034
PMCPMC12540234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.