Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41118030›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2025

Thinking Through Historical Analogies: A Longitudinal Analysis of Sense-Making During the Pandemic.

Brady Wagoner, Lisa Herbig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Crisis and Human Development.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brady WagonerDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. wagoner@psy.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-0731-4048
Lisa HerbigDepartment of European Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8600-5723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historical analogies (HAs) are cultural tools for making sense of a current situation by drawing comparisons to a past event. Their use in communication and understanding can be observed since ancient times and in societies around the world, especially in times of crisis. The present paper explores the role they played in people's everyday thinking during the COVID-19 pandemic, including what HAs were used, how they changed over time, who used them, and to what effect. To do this it draws on a longitudinal project in Germany that included a national representative survey (N = 1080) and follow-up interviews (N = 38) done at three data collection points. The interviews were coded for HAs, the results of which are presented in three steps: first, an overview of the HAs used and their change over time is given; second, characteristics of the most frequent users are outlined; and third, a case study of the most frequent user is presented. The article highlights the everyday use of HAs by people through time, their social distribution between majorities and active minorities, their link to conspiracy mentality and their personal psychological functions.

Indexed as

CommunicationCOVID-19PandemicsSocial EvolutionThinkingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnthropology, CulturalComprehensionFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicLongitudinal StudiesMaleConspiracy theoriesCovid-19 pandemicDialogical analysisHistorical analogiesLongitudinal data

Identifiers

PMID41118030
PMCPMC12540512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.