ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Current status and prospects of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction.
Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid Reconstruction in Head and Neck Surgery: Integration of Virtual Planning, Navigation, and Robotic Microsurgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Effect of Shavings from 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Cutting Guide Materials During Jaw Resection on Bone Healing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has emerged as a transformative approach for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction, significantly enhancing surgical precision, efficiency, and patient outcomes. This review outlines the current status and future prospects of CAS, with a focus on its application in mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. CAS encompasses technologies such as virtual surgical planning (VSP), computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM), and patient-specific plates (PSPs), which have become integral to procedures such as implant placement, orthognathic surgery, and fracture management. While Western countries have led the adoption of CAS, its implementation in Asia, including Japan, is steadily progressing and supported by innovations such as the domestically developed CAS system. Despite its advantages, CAS faces challenges, such as high costs, long preparation times, and limited intraoperative flexibility. This review highlights the clinical benefits, technological advancements, and regional developments in CAS, emphasizing the need for standardized evaluation methods, cost-effective solutions, and broader clinical integration to ensure sustainable and equitable access to advanced surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41118023What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.