Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41118003›Full record

ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2025

Evaluation of objective masticatory performance: an experimental study in healthy adults.

Bachar Reda, Mariam Hmeidan, Manuel Masuino, Luca Contardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bachar RedaDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. rbachar@units.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7793-4552
Mariam HmeidanInstitut National de Santé Publique d'Epidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban (INSPECT-LB), Beirut, Lebanon.
Manuel MasuinoDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Luca ContardoDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to objectively assess masticatory performance and to identify related factors among healthy adults. An experimental study was conducted on 75 healthy adults with a mean age of 51 years between January and June 2023. Masticatory performance was objectively assessed using the sieve method. Spearman correlation examined the association between masticatory performance and age, Functional Tooth Units (FTUs), and total Oral Behavior Checklist-21 (OBC-21) scores. Mann-Whitney U test was used to examine its relationship with sex. Linear Regression was performed to test each factor's relationship with masticatory performance after controlling for other factors. Masticatory performance was associated with age (Spearman coefficient: -0.35, p = 0.002), and FTUs (Spearman coefficient: 0.66, p < 0.001), with higher FTU scores associated with a 30% improvement in chewing performance. Sex and OBC scores showed no significant effect on mastication performance. Multiple linear regression confirmed strong association between masticatory performance and FTUs (standardized ß = 0.670, p < 0.001). FTUs is the major determinant of masticatory performance. Restoring and preserving FTUs through dental care can significantly improve mastication, nutrition, and quality of life, particularly for older individuals.

Indexed as

Functional Tooth Units (FTUs)MasticationMasticatory Performance (MP)Oral behaviorsOral rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41118003
PMCPMC12540237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.