ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Customized implants and All-on-4 in the rehabilitation of anodontia: A case report.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis report aims to present the rehabilitation of a patient with complete anodontia in both jaws using a customized implant-supported prosthesis in the maxilla and the All-on-4 concept in the mandible. CASE PRESENTATION: A 21-year-old male presented with complete anodontia of both the maxilla and mandible. Initially, the patient reported impaired speech, poor chewing, aesthetic dissatisfaction, and social difficulties. Intraoral examination showed severely resorbed edentulous ridges; maxillary atrophy precluded zygomatic implant placement. Customized implants were used as an alternative. Over a 2-year period, the patient showed improved masticatory efficiency, maintained normal speech, and favorable esthetics. No biological or mechanical complications occurred. Bleeding on probing (BOP) was 0, implants remained stable, and radiographs confirmed osseointegration. The patient also received full-arch implant rehabilitation with a maxillary biocompatible high-performance polymer (BioHPP) framework supporting lithium disilicate crowns and a mandibular titanium framework with high-impact polymer composite (HIPC) crowns. Occlusal wear adaptation was observed on the HIPC crowns at the 2-week follow-up after final prosthesis delivery and remained stable at the 2-year follow-up. The mean OHIP-14VN score decreased from 30.0 at baseline to 8.0 at 2 years, while VAS for esthetic satisfaction increased from 5.0 to 10.0.
conclusionThis case highlights the practicality, adaptability, and clinical benefits of combining a customized implant-supported prosthesis with the All-on-4 concept in patients with severe anatomical deficiencies. The outcomes suggest potential improvements in oral health-related quality of life and aesthetic satisfaction. The patient also successfully reintegrated socially and got married following treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41118001What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.