Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117988›Full record

ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2025

[Lung separation in childhood : Anaesthesia management with physiological and technical challenges].

Christoph Geier, Christiane E Beck, Jan Karsten, Katja Nickel

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christoph GeierKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Christiane E BeckKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Jan KarstenKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Katja NickelKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. Nickel.Katja@mh-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung separation for thoracic surgery is associated with varying degrees of difficulty depending on the age group. While the anatomical, physiological and technical requirements for the appropriate selection of bronchial blockers and double-lumen tubes in children > 12 years of age are comparable to those for adults, this is not the case for newborns and infants; however, at 13% they constitute the second largest group of children requiring lung surgery. Lung separation in this age group is technically demanding. The rate of cardiopulmonary complications is many times higher than in older children and adults. These procedures are therefore an anesthesiological challenge that should only be performed in specialized pediatric anesthesiology centers with appropriate personnel and structural facilities. In infants extubation should also be attempted on table to shorten the recovery time. This requires sufficient and multimodal pain therapy. The development of an internal enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol can be helpful for high-quality perioperative treatment.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaThoracic Surgical ProceduresAdolescentAirway ExtubationChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornBronchial blockerDouble-lumen tubePediatric airway managementPediatric anesthesiaSingle-lung ventilationThoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41117988
PMCPMC12552392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.