Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117972›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025

Total joint arthroplasty patients who experience the minimal clinically important difference for worsening (MCID-W) have higher revision rates at 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively.

Perry L Lim, Nicholas Sauder, Shian L Peterson, Christopher M Melnic, Hany S Bedair

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Perry L LimMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Nicholas SauderMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. nxs641@case.edu.
Shian L PetersonMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Christopher M MelnicMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Hany S BedairMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) is critical in assessing patient-reported outcomes following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Although many studies consider the MCID for Improvement (MCID-I), thresholds have also been defined for the MCID for Worsening (MCID-W). However, the potential impact of the MCID-W on surgical outcomes in TJA is under-investigated. This study investigated the association between the MCID-W and revision rate. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study was performed using 2787 primary TJAs-1563 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and 1224 total hip arthroplasties (THAs)-with minimum five-year follow-up. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 10a (PROMIS PF-10a) scores were collected preoperatively and at one-year postoperatively. Patients were classified based on experiencing MCID-I, MCID-W, or "no change" after TJA (scores between MCID-I and MCID-W). MCID-W and MCID-I values were determined by a distribution-based method. Revision-free survival was compared at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years postoperatively.

resultsThe overall revision rate for the entire TJA cohort was 1.1% at 1 year, 1.8% at 3 years, and 2.2% at 5 years postoperatively. TJA patients who experienced MCID-W had a higher revision rate than MCID-I patients at 1 year (3.6 versus 0.8%, P < 0.001), 3 years (5.3 versus 1.1%, P < 0.001), and 5 years postoperatively (5.7 versus 1.5%, P < 0.001). Similarly, stratifying into TKAs and THAs revealed an association between MCID-W and higher revision rates. Revision-free survival curves for MCID-W patients revealed lower survival at 1 year (P < 0.001), 3 years (P < 0.001), and 5 years (P < 0.001).

conclusionsPatients experiencing the MCID-W are more likely to undergo revision surgery at 1, 3, and 5 years following both THA and TKA procedures. The MCID-W may be a useful tool to help identify postoperative THA and TKA patients at highest risk for revision surgery. Future studies utilizing MCID-W as a predictive tool are needed to determine its effectiveness in optimizing TJA patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceReoperationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsMCIDMCID for worseningRevisionTotal joint arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.