ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Evaluation of inflammatory markers in survival analysis of patients undergoing radical cystectomy using machine learning.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Evaluation of inflammatory markers in survival analysis of patients undergoing radical cystectomy using machine learning".World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to create a Machine learning (ML) model using patient demographic, clinical and pathological data for prediction of overall survival in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). Secondly, we evaluated whether inflammatory markers contributed to this model.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the institutional cystectomy database and identified consecutive RC patients. Dataset-1 (DS-1) was analyzed in ML models using 30 original features (including the target feature) encompassing preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data of the patients. All derived inflammatory markers were cumulatively added to DS-1 to create DS-2, and to test the specific contribution of inflammatory markers, they were systematically integrated in an ordinary order based on their predictive ability (DS-3). Markers without predictive contribution were excluded from the DS-3 model. In addition, the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was used to examine the importance of each clinical feature and inflammatory marker.
resultsThe median age of the 241 patients was 65 years. The mortality rate was 60.2% (145/241). Two- and five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 54.7% and 37.2%, respectively. According to DS-1, F
conclusionsML models derived using demographic/clinical features resulted in a maximum F
Indexed as
Identifiers
41117971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.