ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Real-world safety profile of opicapone: a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study provides a real-world analysis of opicapone, a peripheral, selective, and reversible COMT inhibitor approved as adjunctive therapy to levodopa/carbidopa for managing 'off' episodes in Parkinson's disease, utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data from April 2016 to September 2024. We conducted disproportionality analyses using four established pharmacovigilance algorithms: the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Our analysis identified 950 adverse event (AE) reports where opicapone was the primary suspected drug, comprising 91 preferred terms of AEs across 24 system organ classes (SOCs). The analysis revealed significantly higher AE incidence rates among male patients (55.67% vs 44.33%, n = 300) and elderly populations (> 65 years: 74.6% vs ≤ 65 years: 25.4%, n = 252), with common AEs including weight decreased, hypotension/syncope, elevated blood creatine kinase, constipation, and dyskinesia. Notably, unexpected AEs not listed in opicapone's label were discovered, such as miosis, eyelid ptosis, anosmia, and so on. The concomitant use of opicapone and levodopa/carbidopa was associated with an elevated reporting rate of AEs. This study underscores the necessity of robust post-marketing surveillance to monitor the safety of opicapone in real-world settings. Our findings contribute novel insights into its AE profile and highlight potential risks associated with its concomitant use with levodopa/carbidopa, providing valuable evidence to guide clinical decision-making and risk mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41117966What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.