Trial reportExperimental brain research2025
Perception of first and second pain during offset analgesia.
Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Offset analgesia (OA) is a disproportionate reduction in pain perception following a small decrease in noxious stimulation. However, the underlying mechanisms remain a matter of debate. At the peripheral level, specific contributions of A-δ nociceptors have been proposed, although some studies have reported conflicting results. This study aimed to investigate (A-δ vs. C-fiber) fiber contributions to OA by psychophysical assessment of first and second pain sensations in healthy individuals. Thirty-two pain-free participants underwent a randomized within-subject study with two distinct goals: (1) testing the concept of first and second pain to brief heat pulses; (2) investigating brief heat pulses applied during the analgesic phase of OA. Response times (RT), the perception of double sensations and fiber-specific pain descriptors were assessed to detect alterations suggesting predominant A-δ or C-fiber involvement. No significant differences were found between offset and control (constant) trials for the first or second pain reporting or the fiber-specific pain descriptors (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, a significant main effect of trial type and stimulus timing on RTs was observed (p = 0.03, η
Indexed as
Identifiers
41117952What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.