Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117952›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2025

Perception of first and second pain during offset analgesia.

Jakob Poehlmann, Benita von Lemm, Luisa Luebke, Waclaw M Adamczyk, Kerstin Luedtke, Tibor M Szikszay

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jakob Poehlmann *Department of Physiotherapy, Institute of Health Sciences, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. jakob.poehlmann@uni-luebeck.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6870-7373
Benita von Lemm *Department of Physiotherapy, Institute of Health Sciences, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Luisa LuebkeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Institute of Health Sciences, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Waclaw M AdamczykDepartment of Physiotherapy, Institute of Health Sciences, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Kerstin LuedtkeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Institute of Health Sciences, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Tibor M SzikszayDepartment of Physiotherapy, Institute of Health Sciences, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 493000854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Offset analgesia (OA) is a disproportionate reduction in pain perception following a small decrease in noxious stimulation. However, the underlying mechanisms remain a matter of debate. At the peripheral level, specific contributions of A-δ nociceptors have been proposed, although some studies have reported conflicting results. This study aimed to investigate (A-δ vs. C-fiber) fiber contributions to OA by psychophysical assessment of first and second pain sensations in healthy individuals. Thirty-two pain-free participants underwent a randomized within-subject study with two distinct goals: (1) testing the concept of first and second pain to brief heat pulses; (2) investigating brief heat pulses applied during the analgesic phase of OA. Response times (RT), the perception of double sensations and fiber-specific pain descriptors were assessed to detect alterations suggesting predominant A-δ or C-fiber involvement. No significant differences were found between offset and control (constant) trials for the first or second pain reporting or the fiber-specific pain descriptors (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, a significant main effect of trial type and stimulus timing on RTs was observed (p = 0.03, η

Indexed as

AnalgesiaPainPain PerceptionAdultFemaleHot TemperatureHumansMaleNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedPain MeasurementPain ThresholdReaction TimeYoung AdultA-δ and C-fibersCentral processingDouble pain sensationOffset analgesiaPain modulationReaction time

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.