Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117943›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2025

Prevalence and incidence of ICU delirium and pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amanda Y Leong, Stefan Edginton, Laurie A Lee, Natalia Jaworska, Lisa Burry, Kirsten M Fiest, Christopher J Doig, Daniel J Niven

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amanda Y LeongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2593-7911
Stefan EdgintonDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6243-4259
Laurie A LeeFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0008-393X
Natalia JaworskaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2995-5527
Lisa BurryLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, Departments of Pharmacy and Medicine, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6545-3890
Kirsten M FiestDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Christopher J DoigDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8576-9139
Daniel J NivenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. Daniel.niven@albertahealthservices.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9527-0577

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe performed a secondary analysis of a prior systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the prevalence and incidence of ICU delirium and pain.

methodsThe original search examined MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials from inception to May 15, 2023 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022367715). Articles eligible for the current study derived from those previously reviewed at full text review. Included in the current study were randomised or observational studies among critically ill adults, that reported delirium or pain incidence or prevalence. Proportion data was transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine method prior to pooling using a random effects meta-analysis model. Joanna Briggs' Institute prevalence checklist was used for risk of bias.

resultsFrom 517 full-text articles, 213 original studies, 226 publications (183,285 patients) were included. The pooled delirium prevalence (173 studies) was 35.7% (95%CI 32.4-39.0%). The most common delirium subtype was hypoactive (16.5%, 95%CI 12.1-21.4%). The pooled delirium incidence (41 studies) was 28.8% (95%CI 23.2-34.8%). The pooled pain prevalence (11 studies) was 43.5% (95%CI 28.6-58.9%). Delirium prevalence but not incidence decreased since 2013 (before: 39.9%, 95%CI 34.7-45.3% vs. after: 32.3%, 95%CI 28.2-36.5%, p = 0.02). Pain prevalence decreased significantly since publication of pain, agitation and delirium guidelines in 2013 (before: 64.6%, 95%CI 41.6-84.6% vs. after: 35.8%, 95%CI 20.5-52.6%, p = 0.046).

conclusionsDelirium and pain prevalence among adults admitted to ICUs have decreased since publication of pain, agitation and delirium guidelines. However, both remain common, occurring in up to one-half of patients.

Indexed as

DeliriumIntensive Care UnitsPainCritical IllnessHumansIncidencePrevalenceAnalgesicsCritical careDeliriumPainPain measurement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.