ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Concerns and Goals of Women with Isolated Mesh-Associated Pain Syndrome Accessing a Quaternary Mesh Referral Service: A Thematic Analysis.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phenotyping of isolated mesh associated pain secondary to continence mesh device insertion.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisIsolated mesh-associated pain syndrome (I-MAPS) is the commonest reason why women access mesh-complication services. Qualitative work exploring expectations of women with I-MAPS is limited. We aimed to explore the concerns and goals of women with I-MAPS who accessed care at a quaternary-level mesh service to ensure that services are designed to meet their needs.
methodsA total of 280 women with I-MAPS related to a single continence device, were invited to provide free-text comments on concerns and goals related to their mesh complication using the Electronic Patient Assessment Questionnaire (e-PAQ). Of 280 participants, 203 completed the e-PAQ (response proportion 73%) and 179 (response proportion 64%) provided comments. Thematic analysis was performed based on the methodology proposed by Braun and Clarke.
resultsThirty-eight codes were developed, and 109 sub-codes. These defined eight core themes. Concerns regarding pain accounted for 22% of comments (106 out of 489). Concerns about pelvic floor symptoms featured heavily in comments. Symptom resolution was desired by most; however, a proportion requested symptom reduction. Mesh-removal surgery was a common goal pursued; however, a proportion wished information about the safety and future threat of mesh devices.
conclusionsPatients with I-MAPS appear to have concerns unrelated to pain including pelvic floor dysfunction and these may be the primary motivation for accessing mesh services. Although mesh removal was a motivation for many, it was not requested by all. This highlights the importance of services offering individualised and holistic care through multidisciplinary team involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.