ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2025
The use of stone tool sites to estimate the home range of blonde capuchin monkeys in the Caatinga dry forest.
Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The home range represents the space in which individuals of a determined species carry out their essential activities and is influenced by ecological and behavioural factors. Accurate estimates of a given home range are essential for understanding the spatial requirements of a species and for developing effective conservation strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate and characterise the minimum home range of a group of blonde capuchin monkeys (Sapajus flavius) in a Caatinga dry forest in northeastern Brazil, using tool-use sites as spatial indicators. Between November 2023 and December 2024, 370 stone tool sites with evidence of recurrent use (presence of food remains) were recorded and georeferenced using handheld GPS, posteriorly confirmed by camera traps. Based on these stone tool sites, the home range of the group was delineated using the minimum convex polygon method with 100% of the locations. The size of the minimum home range was 53.7 ha; the majority of the home range consisted of Savannah Formations (67.7%, 36.35 ha), followed by anthropogenic areas (27.6%, 14.9 ha). We conclude that lithic sites can serve as an alternative indicator for spatial estimates of blonde capuchin home ranges in contexts where direct observation is difficult. Furthermore, human-modified areas in the home range may reduce the availability of food resources and consequently, stone tool use sites. Our results provide the first home range estimate for blonde capuchins in the Caatinga dry forest and highlight the need to improve habitat quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41117891What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.