ReviewLa Radiologia medica2026
Back to the future in asthma imaging: quantitative assessment and new perspectives.
Review in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary Recommendations for the Use of Chest CT and Bronchial Biopsy in Severe Asthma: An Expert Consensus Based on Real-World Experience.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by respiratory involvement with wheezing, shortness of breath, dyspnea, and cough, along with systemic symptoms. The diagnosis of asthma predominantly relies on clinical history and bronchial hyperreactivity. However, due to its heterogeneity in manifestation, imaging can be a valuable option to support clinical examination. In fact, as stated by the latest guidelines, imaging examinations should not be routinely performed but should be tailored to the patient according to specific conditions or particular situations-such as exacerbation requiring advanced care, comorbidities, or severe asthma-that require further and more specific evaluation. The most common imaging findings in asthma are related to central and peripheral airway involvement, showing bronchial thickening and subsegmental bronchiectasis, along with additional radiographic features such as expiratory air trapping, inspiratory lung hyperinflation, and centrilobular micronodules. Despite having low specificity and sensitivity, chest X-ray is often the first examination performed due to its availability and usefulness in an emergency setting to identify complications as pneumothorax or superimposed infections. Among imaging techniques, HRCT remains the gold standard, allowing for the successful identification of both airway morphological changes (bronchial thickening) and parenchymal involvement related to asthma (centrilobular nodules and air trapping). Moreover, with the development of new techniques such as quantitative CT, more precise measurements of bronchial wall thickening can be done, establishing a potential correlation between HRCT imaging and data from pulmonary function tests. Despite being a promising and revolutionary technique, up to now MRI has played a marginal role in the evaluation of asthma, mainly restricted to assessing lung ventilation. However, recent studies are experimenting with MRI quantitative evaluation of bronchial wall dimensions with great results, which can be promising in the near future for new follow-up possibilities. The aim of this article is to analyze the state of the art of imaging techniques used in the field of asthma and to link advanced imaging findings with everyday clinical practice, offering insight into the future of precision medicine in asthma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41117887What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.