ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Development of attentional disengagement in typically developing children and children with elevated levels of attentional deficits.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to flexibly disengage and shift attention allows us to successfully interact with our environment and develops across infancy, childhood and adolescence. The aim of the present study was to investigate how attentional disengagement abilities develop. We leveraged a robust longitudinal dataset of the Gap-Overlap task of the YOUth cohort with over 3500 children tested at one or more timepoints to track the maturation of attentional control across infancy, childhood and adolescence (5 months, 10 months, 3 years, 6 years, 9 years, 12 years). While we replicated established group-level developmental patterns showing progressive improvement in saccadic reaction times, the time between the appearance of the target and the initiation of the saccade, our findings revealed individual variation in developmental trajectories of the gap effect that cannot be reliably predicted from performance at earlier timepoints. Although we found no associations between Gap-Overlap performance and (parent-reported) attention-related behaviors (n = 99-734 depending on age and measures), this may reflect the difficulty of identifying early markers in highly heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorders and could be limited by examining subclinical traits rather than diagnosed conditions. The increased understanding of individual developmental patterns established here is a prerequisite for the identification of atypical patterns in clinical assessment. Future studies could build on this work by investigating atypical attention profiles across development and their relationship to Gap-Overlap task performance, particularly in clinical populations where attentional differences may be more pronounced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.